Slower delivery
Every new feature needs reconnaissance, cautious PRs, and regression tests in things that should not break from being touched. Velocity drops 20–40% after year 3 of uninvested code.
Move 8 sliders. We'll show the monthly and yearly loss in PLN, the risk level, and where to start paying it down. No email, no sales call, no PDF in exchange for your data.
Developers only — no QA, PMs or designers.
Gross, fully loaded (salary + taxes + benefits).
Years since the first production commit.
Real coverage — not just what the badge shows.
How often code lands in production.
Rolling average for the last 3 months.
How many leave each year and need replacing.
Each symptom raises the cost estimate.
Want a concrete pay-down plan? In 2 weeks we audit the codebase and give you top-10 actions with ROI.
Book the REFACTOR audit →Not "kinda, somehow, pricier." Concrete P&L line items you can name on the board.
Every new feature needs reconnaissance, cautious PRs, and regression tests in things that should not break from being touched. Velocity drops 20–40% after year 3 of uninvested code.
A "critical" ticket every two weeks. On-call, night shifts, rollbacks. Seniors put out old fires instead of building new features. The team burns out faster than you can hire.
Nobody wants to work on 8-year-old code with no tests. A new hire needs 4 months before landing a solo PR. Everyone who leaves takes knowledge that lived nowhere else.
The model is built on 200+ projects we took from audit through refactor to stabilisation. We show you exactly what multiplies what.
Rate × headcount × 168 working hours/month. That's your team's 100% budget.
Code ages non-linearly. We add 6–40% to maintenance cost depending on the main codebase's age.
Test coverage, deploy frequency, symptoms — each input pushes the waste multiplier up or down.
On top of the monthly cost we add 8% annual capitalisation — unserved debt grows, it doesn't sit still.
No — it's an estimation model with ±30% accuracy. For a CEO, CTO or VP Eng it's still radically better than "we feel it's expensive." The REFACTOR audit gets the error band down to ±8% after repo review and team interviews.
No. Everything happens in the browser. Nothing reaches our servers, nothing lands in a CRM. The PDF export is also generated locally. The only thing we persist are your slider settings — in your own localStorage — so a refresh doesn't reset your inputs.
We don't. 8-year-old code with tests, solid docs and up-to-date dependencies is an asset, not a debt. Age is only one of 8 inputs — test coverage and deploy frequency weight it more heavily.
Coverage is a syntactic metric, not a quality one. If 70% of your tests are mocks of mocks, or if tests are flaky, the score drops regardless of the green badge. Tick the right symptoms and the model will account for it.
Always two things in parallel: (1) build CI/CD and smoke tests so things stop breaking on every merge; (2) pick the most-changed module and refactor only that one. Never start with a big-bang rewrite — it's killed more companies than the debt itself.
Fully-loaded team cost: salaries, benefits, tooling, office. Annual burn in 60 seconds.
Core Web Vitals + Lighthouse + CrUX. Priority list instead of just metrics.
Estimate how much each week of delay costs in lost revenue and competitive exposure.
Scope, stack, timeline — a ballpark budget for a new project in 90 seconds.
2 weeks of audit + 90 days of implementation. Fixed price, defined KPIs, money-back if we don't hit the agreed metrics.